翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Lau kata kati ・ Lau Kong ・ Lau Kong Yung v Director of Immigration ・ Lau Kong-wah ・ Lau Kwok Kin ・ Lau Lagoon ・ Lau language (Malaita) ・ Lau Lauritzen ・ Lau Lauritzen, Jr. ・ Lau Lauritzen, Sr. ・ Lau Meng Meng ・ Lau Mulder ・ Lau Nai-keung ・ Lau Nau ・ Lau Nim Yat ・ Lau Ow Bew v. United States ・ Lau Pak Khuan ・ Lau Province ・ Lau Sek Fong ・ Lau Si Io ・ Lau Siu Kai ・ Lau Sui Fei ・ Lau Taveuni Rotuma (Open Constituency, Fiji) ・ Lau Teik Oon ・ Lau Teng Chuan ・ Lau v. Nichols ・ Lau Veldt ・ Lau Wah-sum ・ Lau Wai Lim ・ Lau Wai Ming Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Lau Ow Bew v. United States ： ウィキペディア英語版 Lau Ow Bew v. United States ''Lau Ow Bew v. United States'' was a United States Supreme Court case heard on January 14, 1892 and decided the case on March 14, 1892. Occurring at the beginning of the era of Chinese Exclusion as well as the formation of the United States courts of appeals, the case set precedents for the interpretation of the rights of Chinese merchants as well as the jurisdiction of the new courts. The ruling relied heavily the Burlingame Treaty of 1868, the Angell Treaty of 1880, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the amendments to the Act in 1884, as well as the Evarts Act of 1891. The case helped to establish not only the rights of the Chinese merchant class, but also informed future cases about the power of the Circuit Court of Appeals as well as the perception of Chinese immigrants. == Background == In 1890, Lau Ow Bew, a Chinese merchant who had the United States for seventeen years traveled to China to visit relatives “with the intention of returning as soon as possible to (United States )” (''Lau Ow Bew''). Even though Bew possessed proof of his merchant status from the United States, he neglected to obtain proof of his merchant status from the Chinese government before returning. As a result he could not renter the United States, due to a new provision in section 6 of the Chinese Exclusion Act amended in 1884 (''Lau Ow Bew''). The case was originally heard by the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District Court of California which determined that Bew could not be admitted into the country without the certificate of permission from the Chinese government (United States. Congress). Lau Ow Bew filed for a writ of Habeas Corpus and was denied. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the original ruling. The Supreme Court files a writ of certiorari, and the Supreme Court heard the case in January, 1892. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Lau Ow Bew v. United States」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.